JFCOM

Unrestricted Warfare Symposium, Sponsored by JHU’s APL and SAIS

Posted on

For enterprise technologists and national security professionals and most of all for those who fit both of those descriptions, please check out Johns Hopkins University’s 2009 Unrestricted Warfare Symposium at: http://www.jhuapl.edu/urw_symposium  This symposium seeks to advance our understanding of and solutions for some very complex problems related to our nation’s defense.  I’ll be speaking on a panel at the conference (on issues of cyber war and cyber defense) and hope to see you there. 

The following is from an e-mail from Dr. Ron Luman (Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory National Security Analysis Department Head)

National Security Community Colleagues:
This is a reminder that the Johns Hopkins University’s 2009 Unrestricted Warfare Symposium will be held 24-25 March 2009, and I encourage you to register now at http://www.jhuapl.edu/urw_symposium/.

The fourth annual symposium is in Laurel, MD at JHU’s Applied Physics Laboratory (APL), and is jointly sponsored by APL and the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS). Last year more than 300 participants from government, industry, and academia interacted with distinguished speakers and expert panelists who addressed national security issues from three perspectives: strategy, analysis, and technology. In 2009, this uniquely synergistic approach will be applied to the challenge of identifying interagency imperatives and capabilities.

The symposium presentations and panels are organized around four potential unrestricted lines of attack – cyber, resource, economic/financial, and terrorism. We’ll begin each session with a discussion of the potential for such attacks and then expert roundtable panelists will discuss imperatives for interagency action, offering ideas for enhancing interagency capabilities. A fifth session will focus on the role of analysis in identifying and assessing interagency approaches for preventing and combating these types of attacks.

I am particularly pleased that The Honorable James R. Locher, III, Executive Director of the Project for National Security Reform, will open the symposium as our keynote speaker, providing the Project’s timely findings and recommendations for interagency reform. Throughout the two days featured speakers and distinguished panelists, include: Dr. George Akst, MCCDC; Mr. Eric Coulter, OSD(PA&E); Dr. Richard Cooper, Harvard University; Dr. Stephen Flynn, Council on Foreign Relations; Representative Jane Harman; Professor Bruce Hoffman, Georgetown University; Professor Michael Klare, Hampshire College; Dr. Michael Levi, Council on Foreign Relations; Dr. Matthew Levitt, Washington Institute; Dr. Pete Nanos (DTRA); Mr. James Rickards, Omnis, Inc.; Mr. Frank Ruggiero (Department of State); Dr. Khatuna Salukvadze, Georgian Ministry of Foreign Affairs; Mr. Dan Wolf, Cyber Pack Ventures Inc.; Mr. Bob Work, CSBA, to name a few.

The attached announcement identifies confirmed speakers and other essential information. We encourage dynamic networking, and to facilitate audience participation, we will again be utilizing electronic groupware to collect comments, insights, and questions. The collection of papers and transcripts of discussions will again be published as Proceedings, in both hard copy and electronic form. The 2006 -2008 Proceedings, the current agenda/speakers, and 2009 registration details can be found at the symposium website: http://www.jhuapl.edu/urw_symposium/.

Your experience in national security and defense will contribute unique perspectives and challenging questions to our understanding of Unrestricted Warfare, and I look forward to seeing you next month.

Best regards,

Ron Luman, General Chair

I hope to see you all there.

 
Symposium Attachment:
URW2009Flyer 4Feb-1.pdf

I hope to see you at the Synergy Conference

Posted on

The second annual Synergy Conference and expo will be held 12-15 August 2008 at Marco Island, FL.  Last year’s conference provided a great way for participants to learn from each other and interact with speakers from both operational and intelligence backgrounds.   I sure enjoyed it. It was one of my last official events before leaving DIA.    I had a couple speaking parts, so I got to solicit feedback on my views of the future of technology, and I really appreciated that.  But it was also really enjoyable to be on a panel led by Col Montgomery that let me interact with John Marshall of JFCOM, LTC Mahoney of NRO and Ms. Lynn Schnurr of the USA G2 (she is the CIO for G2). 

I also spoke on a dinner panel with General Clapper and Rita Bush.   What an honor to be seated next to them. 

And then I ended up on a third panel moderated by Lewis Shepherd that included Rita Bush, Gayle von Eckartsberg and David Chaffee.  I enjoyed that panel the most.  Ten minutes before the panel Lewis reminded me that I should have graphics.  No worries, I said, I’m a trained Naval Intelligence officer, I can produce graphics almost instantly.  The result was the attached.
Wired-tired
A key graphic in the presentation is shown here.  This graphic is my list of who is wired and who is tired in enterprise technology.  On the tired list, Acquisition Executives.  They have a hard hard job that is thankless most of the time, largely because of the constant mission demands, the horrible government system they have to work in, and the fast pace of technology that is making them less relevant.

In my comments I mentioned that because of the rapid pace of technology and the increasing tech savvy of power users and the ability for users to “mashup” their own solutions, “Acquisition executives are becoming increasingly irrelevant to the delivery of capabilities to end users.” 

I didn’t mean for that comment to generate drama, but it seemed to do just that!  Friends/allies/associates in the audience went wild with the remark.  Then my comrade and community leader Kevin Meiners asked me for my handwritten notes and used them in introducing Jennifer Walsmith, the Acquisition Executive for all of NSA!   Much to my surprise, Jennifer agreed with me that things are getting harder on the acquisition community and there is a great need for change. 

This year I’ll be spending most of my time watching/listening/visting the expo floor, but I do have a few brief moments on a panel and look forward to seeing how I can insert some drama/controversy to the proceedings.  

Anyway, if you can make it to Synergy, please come.  If you can’t make it, please stay tuned to the blog.  I’ll try to capture interesting parts in future entries.   I’ll also plan on posting to Twitter while there, so please sign up for your Twitter account and connect to me there at http://twitter.com/bobgourley

More on Synergy:

The 2nd Annual Synergy Conference and Expo
will provide a unique forum to highlight advances the Intelligence and
Operations communities have made in support to military operations in a
tactical wartime environment and how these may reform national-level
processes. It will give front line Operators, Key Decision Makers,
Intelligence professionals, Technologists, and Academia the opportunity
to learn from and work with experienced tactical-level representatives.

In conjunction
with U.S. Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM), the Government Emerging
Technology Alliance (GETA) is planning an event that will focus on:

  • Changes occurring and envisioned in the relationship between Operations
    and Intelligence as a result of lessons learned from current wartime
    activities.
  • Each of the Uniformed Services
    sharing their front-line experiences and providing thought provoking
    ideas about the critical need for change in an agile operational
    environment.
  • Insight into activities at the
    Commands and National Intelligence Agencies with the critical
    challenges of better integrating Operations and Intelligence activities
    during a period of Irregular Warfare.

Adm. Stavridis: Think, Read, Write and Publish, and Blog Too

Posted on

James_G._Stavridis
In a previous post I mentioned the AFCEA/JFCOM Joint Warfighting Conference.  I’ve e-mailed friends and associates more detailed thoughts on the significance of the conference.  If you would like my views drop me a note and I’d be glad to share.  

During the conference there were several very important messages for CTOs, including a few controversial points I’m still trying to think about how to diplomatically blog a
bout.  One topic I’d like to discuss now is encouragement from Admiral Stavridis, the four star USN commander of U.S. Southern Command.  He strongly supports and encourages leaders to publish, and I think that is a message all CTOs should listen to.  

A good summation of his call to publish is on the Signal Scape blog at:

Adm. Stavridis: Think, Read, Write and Publish

Here is a quote from that entry:

Adm. James G. Stavridis, USN, commander, U.S. Southern Command,
stepped away from

Read the rest of this entry »

AFCEA, JFCOM, Blogs and Twitter

Posted on

AFCEA just pulled together another great conference (Joint Warfighting 2008).  They have been
real pioneers when it comes to using new Web2.0 technologies during
these events, and that really came out during this conference.  For example, some of
Signal Magazine's greatest writers, including Maryann Lawlor, were at
the conference blogging the highlights of the key events as they were
occurring (they also encouraged other bloggers to post, including the
military PAOs).  For a look at what they did: The AFCEA blog for the Joint Warfighting 2008 conference starts here.  The JFCOM blog for the conference starts here. 

Both AFCEA and JFCOM also used Twitter to give a running feed of what is happening where.   To see what the AFCEA Twitter Feed looked like click here.  To see what the JFCOM feed looked like click here. 

I've been using twitter a bit as well, and I encourage all CTOs to
check it out.  If you use it wisely and configure it to automatically
update your Plaxo feed and Facebook it can be an easy way to keep comrades up to speed on items of interest.  I've also posted a feed on my blog here as a bit of an experiment (I might decide to move that to my personal page instead).

Why do folks like me see a potential benefit from Twitter?  One
example is in the post I did before going to the conference last
week.  After some friends saw that we were able to pre-arrange some
meetings that we would not have done without Twitter.  And, by
following Signal and AFCEA's twitter feed, I was able to maximize my time at
the conference.   

You can check out my feed at: http://twitter.com/bobgourley